<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andy Eick.com &#187; adoption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyeick.com/blog/tag/adoption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyeick.com</link>
	<description>just missed him...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:51:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese architecture</title>
		<link>http://andyeick.com/blog/2008/05/12/chinese-architecture/</link>
		<comments>http://andyeick.com/blog/2008/05/12/chinese-architecture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/2008/05/12/Chinese-architecture.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The typical Chinese roof probably dates from c 1500 BC, but it is known only from the Han dynasty (202 BC &#8211; AD 200). Graceful, overhanging, sometimes in tiers, with upturned eaves. Roof tiles were colorfully glazed and painted.&#8221; &#160; My camera isn&#8217;t this bad &#8212; I&#8217;m telling everyone that China really is over saturated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Chinese architecture by AndrewEick, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreweick/175230250/"><img height="500" alt="Chinese architecture" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/63/175230250_5bdba341a9.jpg" width="338" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;The typical Chinese roof probably dates from c 1500 BC, but it is known only from the Han dynasty (202 BC &#8211; AD 200). Graceful, overhanging, sometimes in tiers, with upturned eaves. Roof tiles were colorfully glazed and painted.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>My camera isn&#8217;t this bad &#8212; I&#8217;m telling everyone that China really is over saturated in color (or the rain made the colors bright).&#160; Amazing to look at the sky, it was just &#8216;white-out&#8217; from pollution.&#160; The pollution when I was there was over powering, tough to even walk out side without my eyes watering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andyeick.com/blog/2008/05/12/chinese-architecture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Korea, Where Boys Were Kings, Revalues Its Girls &#8211; New York Times</title>
		<link>http://andyeick.com/blog/2007/12/26/south-korea-where-boys-were-kings-revalues-its-girls-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://andyeick.com/blog/2007/12/26/south-korea-where-boys-were-kings-revalues-its-girls-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/2007/12/26/south-korea-where-boys-are-kings-revalues-its-girls.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like attitudes towards baby girls in South Korea is changing, but wow, China is 120 boys to 100 girls!&#160; What an imbalance! According to a study released by the World Bank in October, South Korea is the first of several Asian countries with large sex imbalances at birth to reverse the trend, moving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Namdaemun (숭례문), Southern Gate, Seoul Korea by AndrewEick, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andreweick/1571535049/"><img height="333" alt="Namdaemun (숭례문), Southern Gate, Seoul Korea" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/1571535049_2fb8a56ee6.jpg" width="500" align="right" /></a>
<p>It looks like attitudes towards baby girls in South Korea is changing, but wow, China is 120 boys to 100 girls!&#160; What an imbalance!</p>
<blockquote><p>According to a study released by the <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/w/world_bank/index.html?inline=nyt-org">World Bank</a> in October, South Korea is the first of several Asian countries with large sex imbalances at birth to reverse the trend, moving toward greater parity between the sexes. Last year, the ratio was 107.4 boys born for every 100 girls, still above what is considered normal, but down from a peak of 116.5 boys born for every 100 girls in 1990. </p>
<p>The government also played a small role starting in the 1970s. After growing alarmed by the rise in sex-preference abortions, leaders mounted campaigns to change people&#8217;s attitudes, including one that featured the popular slogan &#8220;One daughter raised well is worth 10 sons!&#8221;</p>
<p>Demographers say the rapid change in South Koreans&#8217; feelings about female babies gives them hope that sex imbalances will begin to shrink in other rapidly developing Asian countries &#8212; notably China and India &#8212; where the same combination of a preference for boys and new technology has led to the widespread practice of aborting female fetuses. </p>
<p>&#8220;China and India are closely studying South Korea as a trendsetter in Asia,&#8221; said Chung Woo-jin, a professor at Yonsei University in Seoul. &#8220;They are curious whether the same social and economic changes can occur in their countries as fast as they did in South Korea&#8217;s relatively small and densely populated society.&#8221;</p>
<p>In China in 2005, the ratio was 120 boys born for every 100 girls, according to the <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations_population_fund/index.html?inline=nyt-org">United Nations Population Fund</a>. Vietnam reported a ratio of 110 boys to 100 girls last year. And although India recorded about 108 boys for every 100 girls in 2001, when the last census was taken, experts say the gap is sure to have widened by now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/world/asia/23skorea.html?ex=1356152400&amp;en=e04d0f137d0c46c0&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">South Korea, Where Boys Were Kings, Revalues Its Girls &#8211; New York Times</a> </p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" style="padding-right: 0px;padding-left: 0px;padding-bottom: 0px;margin: 0px;padding-top: 0px">Technorati tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/adoption" rel="tag">adoption</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/korean" rel="tag">korean</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/orphan" rel="tag">orphan</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andyeick.com/blog/2007/12/26/south-korea-where-boys-were-kings-revalues-its-girls-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
